A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out concerning possible neighbours more than the development of the wall in a coastal web site in a very north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide interest adhering to an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives home at Sutton Strand, where allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental worries, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier along with the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a neighborhood disagreement has evolved into a extremely publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction operates at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, search for to develop their relatives dwelling. The situation has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Eire’s coastline, where by enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of recognized citizens. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying made by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted beneath preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two residents of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their organizing authorization by building a wall further than the boundaries of their web-site, leading to an encroachment over a Unique Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore locations are subject matter to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have Long lasting ecological effects, significantly in the delicate coastal surroundings for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach of their setting up authorization, and say the wall, which is partially developed, is in the right posture. Their lawful team has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The pair accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding in an effort to preserve their see, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where by sights of The ocean are both equally really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable endeavours by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, according to sworn proof referenced from the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-significant drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the website Irish Occasions, a picture which has given that turn out to be emblematic with the intensity of the dispute. These steps were not just symbolic; they had been meant to Get Visible evidence of the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Moments reported, describing how the two men entered the drinking water during significant weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm h2o to photograph the positioning turned Just about the most putting descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely famous that such actions have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall extended into a location influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was getting encroached upon.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being covered in detail through the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to grasp the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court listened to even more submissions on whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt building pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant during the lawful timeline.
Within the Main on the dispute can be a disagreement in excess of boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep that the wall, as built, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be described as meticulous Irish Times article about René Collier in his assessment of organizing documents, maps, and disorders connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their motion is motivated by issue for environmental safety and adherence to planning legislation. They reject claims that the case is about preserving A personal look at, insisting as an alternative that it's about making certain that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've got explained their extended-standing relationship to the area and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple only attempting to produce a family members property in accordance with the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Special Location of Conservation and say that each one works have already been completed dependant on Expert tips and permitted plans. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes coming into the sea for the duration of a storm, will not alter the fundamental info.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how arranging disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of building of wall at coastal internet site has grown to be a shorthand description for just a problem that numerous observers see as significantly prevalent. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation involving personal land, public foreshore, and protected habitats is now additional contentious.
The Irish Moments write-up about René Collier mentioned which the businessman had previously been linked to regional advocacy on organizing and environmental problems, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really different Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Times protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waist-substantial h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Times and René Collier waded by way of midsection-high water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both of those the physical reality in the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive method.
Because the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The court should decide whether the wall as constructed complies with organizing permission and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Special Area of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and arranging situations. But the human element continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell alongside one another prolonged after the lawful charges are already paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development functions at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation lengthen further than that tackle. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the value of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. What's more, it underscores how rapidly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental difficulties like environmental defense and property rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays an area of all-natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre in the dispute stands partly built, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Whether or not it is going to finally be altered, removed, or finished as planned will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.