A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving potential neighbours around the construction of a wall in a coastal site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated nationwide interest subsequent an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed relatives house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental considerations, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Occasions short article about René Collier as well as the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a neighborhood disagreement has evolved into a extremely publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction functions at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and an organization director respectively, look for to build their family members home. The situation happens to be emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, where enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of set up citizens. Based on the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying manufactured by their future neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted less than scheduling authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two people of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their organizing authorization by building a wall further than the boundaries of their web page, resulting in an encroachment with a Particular Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore regions are subject to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments might have Long lasting ecological repercussions, particularly in the delicate coastal atmosphere for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach of their setting up authorization, and say the wall, that is partially designed, is in the correct place. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their look at, an allegation that's been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal organizing disputes, in which views of the sea are equally hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular initiatives with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Occasions. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-significant drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Occasions, a picture which has considering that grow to be emblematic from the depth on the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Collect Visible evidence of the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from the sea Irish Periods noted, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o for the duration of extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the website grew to become Just about the most putting descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this sort of steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined intimately via the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Paul Feely and René Collier Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as audience sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court listened to even more submissions on whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key moment within the legal timeline.
At the Main of your dispute is usually a disagreement around boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage the wall, as created, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has become described as meticulous in his examination of arranging paperwork, maps, and circumstances hooked up on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental defense and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject claims that the case is about preserving A personal look at, insisting alternatively that it's about making certain that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've got explained their very long-standing connection to the realm and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple only seeking to produce a family members residence in accordance with the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Unique Place of Conservation and say that every one functions are performed according to Specialist assistance and approved programs. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include moving into The ocean during a storm, don't change the fundamental facts.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute about development of wall at coastal web-site has grown to be a shorthand description for just a problem that numerous observers see as significantly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between non-public land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become more contentious.
The Irish Occasions article about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Beforehand been involved with nearby advocacy on planning and environmental challenges, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from very unique Skilled backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous While using the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-significant water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances and René Collier waded by midsection-large drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily fact of your coastline as well as the symbolic character of your act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive method.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The court need to decide if the wall as developed complies with organizing permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Particular Location of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and setting up ailments. Still the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other long once the legal costs are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above design will work at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, although the implications of the case increase over and above that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. It also underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when basic issues for example environmental defense and residence rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of organic magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre on the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Regardless of whether it will eventually ultimately be altered, taken out, or concluded as prepared will count on the court’s findings. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most closely viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.